{"id":11589,"date":"2025-08-16T20:52:14","date_gmt":"2025-08-16T18:52:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.kanoon-zendanian.org\/?p=11589"},"modified":"2025-08-17T11:38:17","modified_gmt":"2025-08-17T09:38:17","slug":"two-historic-court-rulings-in-the-case-of-parviz-sabeti-torturer-and-senior-member-of-savak","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.kanoon-zendanian.org\/en\/2025\/08\/16\/two-historic-court-rulings-in-the-case-of-parviz-sabeti-torturer-and-senior-member-of-savak\/","title":{"rendered":"Two historic court rulings in the case of Parviz Sabeti, torturer and senior member of SAVAK"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-post\" data-elementor-id=\"11589\" class=\"elementor elementor-11589\" data-elementor-post-type=\"post\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-2ff51789 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"2ff51789\" data-element_type=\"section\" data-e-type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-40731c46\" data-id=\"40731c46\" data-element_type=\"column\" data-e-type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-304d761 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"304d761\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n<p>Association of Iranian Political Prisoners (in Exile), AIPP IN EXILE, has welcomed two rulings\u2019 issued by U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida in the case against former torturer and senior member of the Shah&#8217;s security organization (SAVAk).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-white-color has-text-color has-link-color\">.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>These rulings, while recognizing numerous documents and evidence about Sabeti&#8217;s direct role in directing and facilitating organized torture by SAVAK, rejected his request to dismiss the case on the pretext of statute of limitations, and declared threats and reprisals against the plaintiffs and their lawyers as influential factors in the decision-making. This court ruling also sends a clear message to the torturers, oppressors, and murderers of the Islamic Republic: the perpetrators of repression, torture, and executions are not subject to statute of limitations and cannot escape accountability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-white-color has-text-color has-link-color\">.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This news was first published by a group called ICJA (Iranian Collective for Justice &amp; Accountability), and we are republishing it for public information.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-white-color has-text-color has-link-color\">.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>13 August 2025<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-white-color has-text-color has-link-color\">.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Iranian Collective for Justice &amp; Accountability (ICJA) welcomes two powerful rulings today from the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida in the historic case against former SAVAK official Parviz Sabeti. Together, these decisions represent a tremendous victory for survivors and a decisive step forward in the pursuit of justice and accountability. They also make clear that the pattern of threats against the plaintiffs and their counsel since the filing of the complaint is entered into the court\u2019s record and informs its decisions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-white-color has-text-color has-link-color\">.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In a 17-page ruling, issued on 12 August 2025, the court rejected Sabeti\u2019s Motion to Dismiss the lawsuit\u2019s central claim under the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA), finding that the plaintiffs\u2019 \u201callegations, buttressed by several reliable sources, are clearly sufficient to plead aiding and abetting liability\u201d. The court recognized the detailed historical record supporting the plaintiffs\u2019 allegations that Sabeti provided \u201cknowing substantial assistance\u201d to the plaintiffs\u2019 torturers by \u201cdirect[ing] the actions of SAVAK agents, within both the Third Division and the [Joint] Committee [to Fight Terrorism].\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-white-color has-text-color has-link-color\">.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The court further found that the plaintiffs \u201chave adequately alleged\u201d Sabeti\u2019s participation in a conspiracy involving an agreement between Sabeti and the named alleged torturers of plaintiffs and others within the Committee \u201cto use the alleged detainment and torture methods in furtherance of their goal to suppress opposition to the Shah\u2019s regime and that they did so employ them against Plaintiffs.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-white-color has-text-color has-link-color\">.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The court also concluded that the plaintiffs have sufficiently pleaded Sabeti\u2019s command responsibility involving the exercise of \u201ceffective control\u201d over the alleged torturers. The court acknowledged \u201cdetailed allegations eliciting Defendant\u2019s broad, authoritative role within SAVAK and the Committee, as Defendant recognizes\u201d and found that Sabeti\u2019s arguments before the court claiming the plaintiffs had not sufficiently alleged his \u201ceffective control\u201d over the torturers \u201cdo not logically follow.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-white-color has-text-color has-link-color\">.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Statute of limitations<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-white-color has-text-color has-link-color\">.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In its landmark ruling, the court rejected Sabeti\u2019s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs\u2019 claim based on the statute of limitations. The court found that the plaintiffs\u2019 complaint \u201calleges sufficient facts which may justify an equitable tolling of the statute of limitations\u201d. In this regard, the court referenced \u201cDefendant\u2019s daughter confirming that her family moved, changed their names, and lived in hiding\u201d as well as absence of \u201cavailable remedies in Iran or elsewhere \u2013 compounded by lethal threats emanating from both Iran and the United States.\u201d Crucially, to allow further examination of whether \u201cextraordinary circumstances\u201d prevented the plaintiffs from filing their claim earlier, the court ordered the case to proceed to discovery on this issue. As part of this order, the court set a timeline requiring the parties to complete their submissions on this issue by January 2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-white-color has-text-color has-link-color\">.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Discovery is a pre-trial phase where both sides in a lawsuit gather evidence from each other and from third parties. This process typically involves exchanging documents, taking sworn testimony from witnesses and parties through depositions, and submitting written questions called interrogatories. In this case, discovery may provide an opportunity for plaintiffs to present critical evidence regarding Sabeti\u2019s decades in hiding and the threats they previously faced or continue to face in connection with their pursuit of justice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-white-color has-text-color has-link-color\">.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Propriety of Pseudonymity<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In a separate equally significant 22-page ruling, also issued on 12 August 2025, the court denied Sabeti\u2019s motion to strip the plaintiffs of their privacy right to proceed under pseudonyms. The court acknowledged that \u201c[s]ince the filing of this lawsuit, Plaintiffs have produced significant evidence of serious threats to their safety and well-being, in addition to similar threats directed to their legal counsel.\u201d In this regard, the ruling quoted numerous threats posted on social media, including by individuals connected to Sabeti. The court also stated that \u201cPlaintiffs\u2019 counsel has received death threats from an individual that the FBI determined to be in Iran.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-white-color has-text-color has-link-color\">.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The court concluded that \u201cthere can be no question that filing this case has elicited a plethora of serious threats of violence and other harm against both Plaintiffs and their counsel.\u201d The court added that Sabeti\u2019s \u201cconnection with some of the very individuals making these threats is deeply concerning. This factor continues to weigh heavily, if not determinatively, in favor of pseudonymity.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-white-color has-text-color has-link-color\">.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cThis is a landmark moment,\u201d said an ICJA spokesperson. \u201cThe court has affirmed both the legitimacy of the plaintiffs\u2019 claims and the right of survivors to seek justice free from threats and intimidation against them and their families. The plaintiffs in this case are not seeking political gain or revenge \u2013 they are seeking truth, accountability, and the dignity that comes from having their suffering acknowledged by a court of law.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-white-color has-text-color has-link-color\">.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The ICJA commends the extraordinary courage and perseverance of the plaintiffs, who have carried the weight of their suffering for decades in silence and resilience. These rulings speak not only to the atrocities of the past, but to the urgent reality of torture and injustice that continues in Iran today and to the persistent patterns of harassment and threats against those seeking justice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-white-color has-text-color has-link-color\">.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The court\u2019s message is unmistakable: those responsible for gross human rights violations cannot hide from accountability \u2013 no matter how many years have passed, how powerful their positions, or how far they try to run. The court has also made clear that threats and reprisals against survivors, far from silencing or suppressing the pursuit of justice, can become part of the court\u2019s record and inform its decisions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-white-color has-text-color has-link-color\">.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>About the Case<br><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>.<strong><br><\/strong>Parviz Sabeti, a senior official in Iran\u2019s pre-1979 secret police, SAVAK, is facing a<a href=\"https:\/\/www.law360.com\/articles\/2303845\/ex-iranian-intel-official-accused-of-torture-in-fla-suit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">&nbsp;landmark $225 million lawsuit<\/a>&nbsp;in U.S. federal court brought by three former political prisoners now living in the United States. As head of SAVAK\u2019s Third Division, Sabeti is accused of overseeing and<a href=\"https:\/\/www.independent.co.uk\/news\/world\/americas\/iran-torture-lawsuit-us-shah-b2703880.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">&nbsp;institutionalizing torture<\/a>, including electrocution, beatings, suspension by the wrists, sleep deprivation, and coerced confessions, against dissidents of the Shah\u2019s regime. Plaintiffs allege his tactics left a lasting legacy later adopted by the Islamic Republic. After decades in hiding, Sabeti resurfaced publicly during Iran\u2019s 2022\u20132023 \u201cWoman Life Freedom\u201d uprising, creating the first real opportunity for survivors to seek justice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-white-color has-text-color has-link-color\">.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The case against Sabeti has sparked a powerful reckoning amongst Iranians over the enduring trauma of torture and the urgent need to ensure that all survivors have a path to justice and accountability. It comes at a pivotal moment, as Iranians confront the possibility of political change and envision a future grounded in respect for human rights where torture and repression no longer go unaddressed and unpunished.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color\">.<br><br><strong>Reae Ruligs low<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/iranjusticecollective.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Order-on-the-Motion-to-Dismiss.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Order on Motion to Dismiss<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/iranjusticecollective.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Order-on-Motion-for-Reconsideration.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Order on Motion for Reconsideration<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law360.com\/articles\/2303845\/ex-iranian-intel-official-accused-of-torture-in-fla-suit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>More about the case<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Association of Iranian Political Prisoners (in Exile), AIPP IN EXILE, has welcomed two rulings\u2019 issued by U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida in the case against former torturer and senior member of the Shah&#8217;s security organization (SAVAk). . These rulings, while recognizing numerous documents and evidence about Sabeti&#8217;s direct role in directing [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":11576,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[89],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11589","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-prison"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanoon-zendanian.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11589","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanoon-zendanian.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanoon-zendanian.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanoon-zendanian.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanoon-zendanian.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11589"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanoon-zendanian.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11589\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11625,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanoon-zendanian.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11589\/revisions\/11625"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanoon-zendanian.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11576"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kanoon-zendanian.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11589"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanoon-zendanian.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11589"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kanoon-zendanian.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11589"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}